do you believe that writing history is subjective ?

https://study.com/academy/lesson/understanding-the-subjective-nature-of-history.htmlhttps://study.com/academy/lesson/understanding-the-subjective-nature-of-history.html
Subjective History | Definition, Examples & Importance
Nov 21, 2023Today, most historiographers agree that the study of history is necessarily subjective. Historians bring their own biases and interpretations to their work, resulting in differing views of…https://www.jstor.org/stable/468740https://www.jstor.org/stable/468740
Writing History: Subjective Authoritativeness
Commentary Writing History: Subjective Authoritativeness Marco Portales T_ _HERE WAS a time when literary critics kept to literature and when what happened and history were automatically assumed to be one and the same. Today there is a ubiquitous sense that all fields are equally open for speculation and that everything,https://philosophynow.org / issues / 88 / History_The_Study_of_the_Subjective_and_Unimportanthttps://philosophynow.org / issues / 88 / History_The_Study_of_the_Subjective_and_Unimportant
History: The Study of the Subjective and Unimportant
History as a series of events covers the lives of billions upon billions of people from every country for thousands of years. Each individual’s actions, omissions, and everyday life, from their birth until their death, whether emperor or peasant, is history, and worthy of study in its own right. We tend to see as a grand theatre – a …https://www.britannica.com/topic/philosophy-of-history/Objectivity-and-evaluationhttps://www.britannica.com/topic/philosophy-of-history/Objectivity-and-evaluation
Philosophy of history – Objectivity, Evaluation, Interpretation
One topic that was recurrently examined in this connection was the role of evaluation (specifically, of moral evaluation) in historical writing—a subject, incidentally, about which historians themselves are apt to exhibit a certain uneasiness.https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191659902000062https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191659902000062
Objectivity and the writing of history – ScienceDirect
Ontology Reading Mark Bevir’s recent defence of objectivity via an intentional theory of meaning, and his claim that it might be possible to extend this logic of the history of ideas to history in general, [1, p. 316] has prompted me to address how historians approach objectivity more broadly.https://www.historians.org/teaching-and-learning/teaching-resources-for-historians/teaching-and-learning-in-the-digital-age/the-history-of-the-americas/the-conquest-of-mexico/for-students/writing-history-an-introductory-guide-to-how-history-is-producedhttps://www.historians.org/teaching-and-learning/teaching-resources-for-historians/teaching-and-learning-in-the-digital-age/the-history-of-the-americas/the-conquest-of-mexico/for-students/writing-history-an-introductory-guide-to-how-history-is-produced
Writing History: An Introductory Guide to How History Is Produced
This is reinforced through the use of textbooks used in teaching history. They are written as though they are collections of information. In fact, history is NOT a collection of facts about the past. History consists of making arguments about what happened in the past on the basis of what people recorded (in written documents, cultural …https://www.jstor.org/stable/24400365https://www.jstor.org/stable/24400365
HISTORY OBJECTIVE AND SUBJECTIVE – JSTOR Home
HISTORY OBJECTIVE AND SUBJECTIVE * History owes its fascination and popularity to the fact that, as the study of man in society, it deals with human character, human wills and minds and emotions. The phenomena which the historian examines are as far as possible removed from those rarefied abstractions, utterly incomprehensible to a mere historianhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/505803https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/505803
Review Article Historical Subjectivity: A Review Essay*
torians may write about the personal lives of scholars, historical subjectivity rarely becomes the focus of historical study—even though historical subjectivity operates on a daily basis. I (the historian) am not the subject of the history (what you want to know); or at least not usually.7 Subjectivity initiates inquiry, provides impetus, evenhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1016/S0191-6599(02)00006-2https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1016/S0191-6599(02)00006-2
Objectivity and the writing of history – Taylor & Francis Online
4 Of course, if we believe we cannot recover the intentionality of the author of the evidence, it implies several significant things about doing (or not doing!) history: it suggests that we can not know the original or primal meaning of the evidence; it means rejecting the correspondence theory of knowledge; it casts doubt on the idea of being an objective historian who can find out the truth …https://epublications.marquette.edu/phil_fac/618https://epublications.marquette.edu/phil_fac/618
The Subject of History: Historical Subjectivity and Historical Science …
Tucker, Ericka L., The Subject of History: Historical Subjectivity and Historical Science (2013). Philosophy Faculty Research and Publications. 618. Abstract In this paper, I show how the phenomenological and hermeneutic traditions and method converge on their treatment of the historical subject. Thinkers from both traditions converge on the … lesoutrali bot